Frequently Asked Certification Questions

• Key exhibits are missing or incomplete (e.g., schematics, block diagrams, labeling, user manual, tune‑up procedure, RF exposure data).
• RF exposure documentation does not match the device’s intended use condition (portable vs. mobile, separation distance, simultaneous transmitters).
• Products with both radio transmitters and digital circuitry do not include the required unintentional‑radiator documentation.

How ACB helps: Use our templates and checklists to minimize rework.

Provide each exhibit as a standalone PDF with clear titles, page numbers, and device identification. Photos should be sharp and show internal/external details and labeling. Manuals must reflect the final marketed version.

Not normally. Provide the final test reports that demonstrate compliance. Keep raw data accessible in case it is later requested.

Please provide all exhibits in English so reviewers can evaluate them accurately and efficiently.

You can find the application forms, example letters, and templates you’ll need on our documents page. For complex or multi‑market projects, contact your regional ACB representative.

Timelines depend on complete, accurate exhibits. If additional information is required, the total project time will reflect the response period needed to address those requests.

We evaluate each transmitter independently and as part of the total system. Provide antenna details, power levels, operating modes, and RF exposure evaluations or exemptions.

A certified module can simplify integration, but the host device may still require additional testing depending on antenna configuration, enclosure, or emissions profiles.

Select the appropriate method based on use distance, frequency, and output power. Document the logic, calculations, and worst‑case assumptions clearly.

Intentional transmitters generally require Certification, while digital circuitry may fall under SDoC. Many devices require both.

Regulatory updates may introduce new requirements or transition rules. We will inform you if updates impact your ongoing application.

SDRs may require documentation of firmware security, RF control protections, and change management procedures.

Product Certification involves external review by authorities, while RED compliance relies on the manufacturer’s Declaration of Conformity.

Authorization under the RED is a self‑declaration by the manufacturer, not a certification granted by a regulator.

Yes. We help create test plans that support multiple regions efficiently and reuse data where permitted.

Often yes, provided requirements align and the device configuration is unchanged. Some countries require additional documentation.

We support both long‑term and short‑term confidentiality options depending on exhibit type and ensure correct handling of redacted and unredacted files.

Some engineering exhibits may qualify for long‑term confidentiality. Items like photos generally qualify only for short‑term confidentiality tied to launch timing.

Minor changes may qualify for a permissive‑change filing. Provide a summary and we will determine the correct path.

If firmware affects RF behavior, a filing may be required. If not, internal documentation updates may be sufficient.

Clarification ensures accuracy and prevents regulatory issues such as audits, fines, or application dismissal.

Yes. You will have a dedicated ACB reviewer to maintain consistency and keep the project moving efficiently.

We aim to respond within one business day. Complex issues may require additional analysis time.

Yes. Pre‑review helps identify issues early and reduces approval delays.

For radio certifications, testing should be performed by a competent and experienced lab. SDoC allows more flexibility with proper documentation.

Yes. Provide information about your device and markets, and we can recommend suitable labs.